↓ Skip to main content

Study of ground subsidence in northwest Harris county using GPS, LiDAR, and InSAR techniques

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Study of ground subsidence in northwest Harris county using GPS, LiDAR, and InSAR techniques
Published in
Natural Hazards, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1067-x
Authors

Shuhab D. Khan, Zheng Huang, Ayca Karacay

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 23%
Researcher 7 20%
Unspecified 6 17%
Student > Master 5 14%
Professor 2 6%
Other 7 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 46%
Unspecified 8 23%
Engineering 5 14%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2016.
All research outputs
#1,126,065
of 12,338,222 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#103
of 990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,975
of 230,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#6
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,338,222 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 990 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.