RT @internetmaggie: Specifically, the idea of porn 'addiction' is a fabrication unsupported by serious clinical practices or medical resear…
RT @internetmaggie: Specifically, the idea of porn 'addiction' is a fabrication unsupported by serious clinical practices or medical resear…
Specifically, the idea of porn 'addiction' is a fabrication unsupported by serious clinical practices or medical research. From @DrDavidLey @NicoleRPrause & Peter Finn: https://t.co/LIDYDXXtXi
@ItalianGoth @alexanderp1210 @ktwagie @Anitwtgovt Porn addiction isn't real https://t.co/d19pAUaH3S
@The_Wub_ @notbenfish Porn addiction is not a real clinical entity. You can't get *addicted* to porn. https://t.co/V18JES2t2r
RT @elfsternberg: "Patients reporting ‘addictive’ use of visual pornography could be better treated by addressing gender, sexual orientatio…
"Patients reporting ‘addictive’ use of visual pornography could be better treated by addressing gender, sexual orientation, libido, desire for sensation, along with the internal and external conflicts influenced by religiosity and desire discrepancy." http
@Max_eMarketing @observethyself Huh, it is related to positive esteem in LGBT youth, higher orgasm consistency and sexual satisfaction in women, more accurate genital knowledge...I think there's a lot more grey area in those data. https://t.co/2VmmxwwzoV
@bOi46483496 @BPoptart64 @ninja_muffin99 Source 1: https://t.co/7znSvF8mPW Source 2: https://t.co/ZWpJnJY797 Source 3: https://t.co/QuMNiPN6g5 Source 4: https://t.co/nKbmZSH9ab Source 5: https://t.co/HJtBwpKx9k Btw, I would refrain from using Wikipedia as
@psientificeden Source? Here are two of mine. https://t.co/KYBIvjYZbX https://t.co/VTcve0aleC This article is more accessible & references experts debunking common myths. https://t.co/i3x6ZsJQCQ
https://t.co/jhVz4UB7RV A genuine study in Sexual Psychology. "Porn addiction" simply doesn't exist. It's Hypersexuality or hypersexuality disorder :]
RT @unit_b0y: @AmaitheCat @bearbrandmilkk https://t.co/ugxwb01mB8 Here’s one. WHO also describes porn addiction as hypersexuality or hypers…
@AmaitheCat @bearbrandmilkk https://t.co/ugxwb01mB8 Here’s one. WHO also describes porn addiction as hypersexuality or hypersexual disorder
@endwasted Потому что ты мне скидываешь ссылку про ухудшение эрекции, а я привожу контраргумент в виде статьи. Вот, например, ещё статья. https://t.co/LHcKKrSwUi
@cielly____ @JGuilherme616 @pessoa_planeta @meeelzinho @Indisponigor Você não pode afirmar isso https://t.co/CrwjkVll25
@anfybiu @meeelzinho @Indisponigor Eu fui ler alguns estudos e descobri que toda a nossa discussão é irrelevante, o vício em pornografia é algo contestado por especialistas hoje em dia e a designação "vício em pornografia" já foi criticada por entidades ps
@Ladrinaline artikel ini yg pernah saya baca. sepertinya ada litrev2 baru utk highlight studi terbaru tapi saya blm baca. https://t.co/XulyCmkUbF
RT @fyfriendlyfyre: @silcendtt @DrDavidLey Study: The Emperor Has No Clothes: A Review of the ‘Pornography Addiction’ Model https://t.co/7D…
@silcendtt @DrDavidLey Study: The Emperor Has No Clothes: A Review of the ‘Pornography Addiction’ Model https://t.co/7D2spyweEE
RT @eveondaputer: @shonenknives i have an article outlining the basics of this n an archive of a paper on the absence of scientific support…
@neigevil @formulapepega It cannot be stated enough that porn addiction is a pseudoscience turned grift https://t.co/d19pAUaH3S
RT @NicoleRPrause: New ICD-11 diagnosis (not yet used in the USA) appears directly harmful to LGBTQ+ in recent study https://t.co/rVlCqu2SN…
RT @NicoleRPrause: New ICD-11 diagnosis (not yet used in the USA) appears directly harmful to LGBTQ+ in recent study https://t.co/rVlCqu2SN…
@hathaway_flash There's no such thing as porn addiction. Try again https://t.co/d19pAUaH3S
RT @NicoleRPrause: New ICD-11 diagnosis (not yet used in the USA) appears directly harmful to LGBTQ+ in recent study https://t.co/rVlCqu2SN…
RT @NicoleRPrause: New ICD-11 diagnosis (not yet used in the USA) appears directly harmful to LGBTQ+ in recent study https://t.co/rVlCqu2SN…
RT @NicoleRPrause: New ICD-11 diagnosis (not yet used in the USA) appears directly harmful to LGBTQ+ in recent study https://t.co/rVlCqu2SN…
RT @NicoleRPrause: New ICD-11 diagnosis (not yet used in the USA) appears directly harmful to LGBTQ+ in recent study https://t.co/rVlCqu2SN…
RT @NicoleRPrause: New ICD-11 diagnosis (not yet used in the USA) appears directly harmful to LGBTQ+ in recent study https://t.co/rVlCqu2SN…
RT @NicoleRPrause: New ICD-11 diagnosis (not yet used in the USA) appears directly harmful to LGBTQ+ in recent study https://t.co/rVlCqu2SN…
It is documented that the narratives of “sex/porn addiction” are harmful to LGBTQ+ people. You can also read my chapter on this subject in Erotically Queer: https://t.co/CklFsr2XLw @PinkTherapyUK
RT @NicoleRPrause: New ICD-11 diagnosis (not yet used in the USA) appears directly harmful to LGBTQ+ in recent study https://t.co/rVlCqu2SN…
RT @NicoleRPrause: New ICD-11 diagnosis (not yet used in the USA) appears directly harmful to LGBTQ+ in recent study https://t.co/rVlCqu2SN…
RT @NicoleRPrause: New ICD-11 diagnosis (not yet used in the USA) appears directly harmful to LGBTQ+ in recent study https://t.co/rVlCqu2SN…
New ICD-11 diagnosis (not yet used in the USA) appears directly harmful to LGBTQ+ in recent study https://t.co/rVlCqu2SNx which we warned about https://t.co/BIwk7UNqtQ and it unsurprising since the WHO said "homosexuality" was illness well into the 1990's.
@EDahaka @Caesar06784 @YurieAkko @GuildsOfAvlaan here is a better one https://t.co/d19pAUaH3S
@Sparkpoodle1 it's so over https://t.co/d19pAUaH3S https://t.co/QV1gTDoYZR
@nortynanka That's an unhealthy relationship with porn. Repeated difficulties or even an inability to change a behaviour doesn't necessarily imply an addiction, even when we feel quite distressed about the behaviour. https://t.co/suKeptZcge
@rezesshawty @RiseFromAsh1984 "proof?" just say you're lazy and you've chosen ignorance https://t.co/d19pAUaH3S
@kaczyzm_2 @bxo_pl Proszę bardzo: https://t.co/c4XLJpIFIk https://t.co/d7l3cPFzBh Dodatkowo tutaj o tym że to narazie jest chujowo zbadany temat: https://t.co/BqptbAfXn0 https://t.co/3hgJ1P0SYV
@VeteranGamerUK @KrizoSusanna @RebeccaAVelo @BarbiesOpinions @ZeldaTheChicken @disseminatrix13 Our longer peer-reviewed explanation https://t.co/BIwk7UNYjo
@itslanabee Even then I've yet to see any compelling scientific evidence that it's an addiction (altered brain chemistry leading to dependency) and not just some folks' unhealthy coping mechanism. https://t.co/VtFw917noZ This article's abstract (and conten
@RMazurs @laumapret https://t.co/vra4PtoUM5 This paper has a lot of resources linked talking about the language used in research vs media and how the addiction model is ill-equipped for addressing behavioural compulsions.
RT @MxJackParker: Stigmatizing the viewing of porn is what causes the negative psychological impacts that people describe having from watch…
RT @MxJackParker: Stigmatizing the viewing of porn is what causes the negative psychological impacts that people describe having from watch…
@CommonCourtesan The addiction model isn't used for compulsive porn use, because the dopamine release you're talking about doesn't cause physical dependency and therefore doesn't meet the criteria for it. I agree that unhealthy porn use exists. https://t.
RT @MxJackParker: Stigmatizing the viewing of porn is what causes the negative psychological impacts that people describe having from watch…
Stigmatizing the viewing of porn is what causes the negative psychological impacts that people describe having from watching porn - it's not the porn, it's the belief that they're bad people for watching it. https://t.co/vra4PtoUM5 https://t.co/UVNhgy5MF
@nyorobonzo @superfukcincool Nick, there is no evidence that porn addiction is real https://t.co/d19pAUaH3S
@NiroQuill @punished_freak Porn addiction isn't real https://t.co/G1nYHaPCIy https://t.co/o6FnL03dcW https://t.co/jKfSAqLW1t
@SKELLFANFICTION @ShotaChurch porn addiction is not real https://t.co/d19pAUaH3S
@DarkTheEnigma Wrong question. Ask why is it real. https://t.co/d19pAUaH3S
@XerdRAWR @TheSteelStag @carcikitsune https://t.co/lb6vP7UpCW If it's existence hasn't been proven, then the onus is on those who claim its real to prove it. Otherwise you're using unsubstantiated claims to disparage people utilizing a psychological disord
@_Rewhan Reminder that porn addiction has no real basis in psych. There may be people who have a dependent relationship with it, but this is due to a lack of other needs, not something intrinsic with porn consumption. https://t.co/lb6vP7TRNo
@FakeFrenSlayer Porn addiction is not real. The entire thing is garbage pushed by churches, for-profit clinics, and anti-sex weirdos https://t.co/d19pAUaH3S
@_ChiefCherokee_ @doctorbaixue YMMV in terms of whether recontextualizing the concept of "porn addiction" will help, but it may be worth taking into consideration that the response people have to highly stimulating imagery is not exclusive to sexual conten
@kenyasbaek @PigOfGreed @CEO_of_Yutaka @Lilithmoon0 @OpalanderYT @berserker144 Gave you an article from the APA first. But you know, if one click is to tiering for you to do here is the actual study, feel free to buy it. Also good, be busy and go away, a
Source https://t.co/iF0CfVkwAG
RT @HayleyHemholtzz: @Anon08076278 @Haloinreverse84 This theory has been tested and dis-proven. https://t.co/XffUcN9Vkg
RT @primalpoly: @BritMartinez @simonelhanna FWIW, the best scientific evidence challenges the concept of 'porn addiction', which is a pseud…
Alguien pásele a Yonhy Lescano
@BritMartinez @simonelhanna FWIW, the best scientific evidence challenges the concept of 'porn addiction', which is a pseudo-diagnosis promoted by people who make money running 'sex addiction treatment' clinics. https://t.co/gnGKATlYYq
@_HectorJose_ Los modelos de adicción al porno han tenido muchas criticas por no considerar otros factores https://t.co/F4NLL0U5oZ La revision mas grande concluye que la literatura esta muy limitada por estudios chuscos https://t.co/PLIQ0gYmKo https://t.
@Bennobear_ @23ZollFelge @moisinoffiziell Wenn du dich trotz deiner stark voreingenommenen Meinung trotzdem mal mit anderen Standpunkten befassen willst, kann ich dir diesen Link hier als Anfang empfehlen. https://t.co/rDbEVDN2wI
@baqlavas measurement, the same result seen in an old systematic review (https://www. https://t.co/M5O2MYcHIY), with this in mind, casts considerable doubt on and refutes his claims regarding pornography addiction. https://t.co/AhhNm8cwmW
@DL46255360 @TSteeplejack @guardian That's not true - i.e. https://t.co/SjcsTE4XVb https://t.co/nSpegPjfLn
@Softer22 revisión revisión sistemática (https://t.co/OxRR7rTxoc) replicándose en esta. Ahora pasaré a señalar los datos actuales sobre la neurobiología de la adicción:
@Vannialll Also, "porn addiction" has been roundly debunked, and for a long, long time. So... put that one back in your pocket. https://t.co/t1g2bto8GG
@ElElreycarmesi @Megamus_fuente1 por ejemplo cuando cita la pagina de "yourbrainonporn" citando el mito de la adiccion a la pornografia algo que ha sido desmontado https://t.co/pexmgIcLnB
@ElElreycarmesi @Megamus_fuente1 No me puedo tomar enserio cuando cita una pagina anti porno citando la adiccion a la pornografia cuando es algo desacreditado https://t.co/ASCHcn920y Y ademas de cuando muchos lobbistas anti porno omiten factores externos
RT briandavidearp: The Emperor Has No Clothes: A Review of the ‘Pornography Addiction’ Model https://t.co/Te0XNakTLM https://t.co/dTHEQJrg46
RT @briandavidearp: The Emperor Has No Clothes: A Review of the ‘Pornography Addiction’ Model https://t.co/3OKkRk5b0F https://t.co/ZWU3oy5B…
The Emperor Has No Clothes: A Review of the ‘Pornography Addiction’ Model https://t.co/3OKkRk5b0F https://t.co/ZWU3oy5Bnz
@DiegoMa50148201 @balkraix ¿Como se diseña para volver adicta a la gente? ¿Haciendo que le guste? Coño! Igual que todo lo que se produce para vender! ¿Que problema hay en el egoísmo intrascendente? https://t.co/VgLFaUeV6X
Shouldn't you maybe at least cite work like this that demonstrates that pornography addiction label is not "brought into contention" but unscientific? https://t.co/nSpegPjfLn
RT @balkraix: 1-https://t.co/gXt30urDs7 2-https://t.co/DnK8xYqrkv 3-Una revision de mas de 150 estudios donde desmontan el modelo de adic…
1-https://t.co/gXt30urDs7 2-https://t.co/DnK8xYqrkv 3-Una revision de mas de 150 estudios donde desmontan el modelo de adiccion y señalan ciertas ventajas https://t.co/ASCHcn920y https://t.co/4TAW6woEAw
Aaaaaand @EmmaRipps https://t.co/3ofBLJB0Bm
RT @SteveStuWill: Many are convinced that porn is harmful. But if anything, the evidence points the other way https://t.co/zIOL9TV1gU https…
RT @SteveStuWill: Many are convinced that porn is harmful. But if anything, the evidence points the other way https://t.co/zIOL9TV1gU https…
RT @JosefKooper: @unvarnishedvoid This is about porn, but surely applies to vidyagames and guns - TL;DR they provide a healthy outlet that…
RT @SteveStuWill: Many are convinced that porn is harmful. But if anything, the evidence points the other way https://t.co/zIOL9TV1gU https…
RT @SteveStuWill: Many are convinced that porn is harmful. But if anything, the evidence points the other way https://t.co/zIOL9TV1gU https…
RT @_John_Dose_: @NewWorldHominin Is there data supporting this claim? Here's some data suggesting the opposite https://t.co/0FPkvufQuN
RT @SteveStuWill: Many are convinced that porn is harmful. But if anything, the evidence points the other way https://t.co/zIOL9TV1gU https…
RT @SteveStuWill: Many are convinced that porn is harmful. But if anything, the evidence points the other way https://t.co/zIOL9TV1gU https…
RT @SteveStuWill: Many are convinced that porn is harmful. But if anything, the evidence points the other way https://t.co/zIOL9TV1gU https…
RT @SteveStuWill: Many are convinced that porn is harmful. But if anything, the evidence points the other way https://t.co/zIOL9TV1gU https…