The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Measuring competence in central venous catheterization: a systematic-review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
SpringerPlus, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2193-1801-3-33 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Irene WY Ma, Nishan Sharma, Mary E Brindle, Jeff Caird, Kevin McLaughlin |
| Abstract |
Central venous catheterization is a complex procedural skill. This study evaluates existing published tools on this procedure and systematically summarizes key competencies for the assessment of this technical skill. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 32% |
| Unknown | 17 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2014.
All research outputs
#12,893,599
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#621
of 1,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,689
of 304,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#29
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.