↓ Skip to main content

Non-invasive multiresidue screening methods for the determination of pesticides in heritage collections

Overview of attention for article published in Heritage Science, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Non-invasive multiresidue screening methods for the determination of pesticides in heritage collections
Published in
Heritage Science, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/2050-7445-2-3
Authors

Iain D Rushworth, Catherine Higgitt, Margaret Smith, Lorraine T Gibson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 20%
Student > Master 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 7 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 20%
Environmental Science 4 16%
Materials Science 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 10 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2014.
All research outputs
#16,402,928
of 24,164,942 outputs
Outputs from Heritage Science
#347
of 455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,900
of 316,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heritage Science
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,164,942 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.