↓ Skip to main content

Distributed Video Coding: Trends and Perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Distributed Video Coding: Trends and Perspectives
Published in
EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing, April 2010
DOI 10.1155/2009/508167
Authors

Frederic Dufaux, Wen Gao, Stefano Tubaro, Anthony Vetro

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 3%
Japan 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Taiwan 1 3%
Unknown 31 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 29%
Student > Master 6 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Other 8 23%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 16 46%
Engineering 11 31%
Mathematics 1 3%
Materials Science 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing
#56
of 233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,917
of 102,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 233 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.