↓ Skip to main content

Single‐cell RNA‐sequencing of the brain

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Medicine, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
Title
Single‐cell RNA‐sequencing of the brain
Published in
Clinical and Translational Medicine, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40169-017-0150-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raquel Cuevas‐Diaz Duran, Haichao Wei, Jia Qian Wu

Abstract

Single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) is revolutionizing our understanding of the genomic, transcriptomic and epigenomic landscapes of cells within organs. The mammalian brain is composed of a complex network of millions to billions of diverse cells with either highly specialized functions or support functions. With scRNA-seq it is possible to comprehensively dissect the cellular heterogeneity of brain cells, and elucidate their specific functions and state. In this review, we describe the current experimental methods used for scRNA-seq. We also review bioinformatic tools and algorithms for data analyses and discuss critical challenges. Additionally, we summarized recent mouse brain scRNA-seq studies and systematically compared their main experimental approaches, computational tools implemented, and important findings. scRNA-seq has allowed researchers to identify diverse cell subpopulations within many brain regions, pinpointing gene signatures and novel cell markers, as well as addressing functional differences. Due to the complexity of the brain, a great deal of work remains to be accomplished. Defining specific brain cell types and functions is critical for understanding brain function as a whole in development, health, and diseases.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 236 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 26%
Researcher 39 17%
Student > Bachelor 27 11%
Student > Master 25 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 32 14%
Unknown 39 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 54 23%
Neuroscience 52 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 4%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 43 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2018.
All research outputs
#6,429,807
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#218
of 869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,613
of 317,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 869 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them