↓ Skip to main content

Timescales and Mechanisms of Sigh-Like Bursting and Spiking in Models of Rhythmic Respiratory Neurons

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Timescales and Mechanisms of Sigh-Like Bursting and Spiking in Models of Rhythmic Respiratory Neurons
Published in
The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13408-017-0045-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yangyang Wang, Jonathan E. Rubin

Abstract

Neural networks generate a variety of rhythmic activity patterns, often involving different timescales. One example arises in the respiratory network in the pre-Bötzinger complex of the mammalian brainstem, which can generate the eupneic rhythm associated with normal respiration as well as recurrent low-frequency, large-amplitude bursts associated with sighing. Two competing hypotheses have been proposed to explain sigh generation: the recruitment of a neuronal population distinct from the eupneic rhythm-generating subpopulation or the reconfiguration of activity within a single population. Here, we consider two recent computational models, one of which represents each of the hypotheses. We use methods of dynamical systems theory, such as fast-slow decomposition, averaging, and bifurcation analysis, to understand the multiple-timescale mechanisms underlying sigh generation in each model. In the course of our analysis, we discover that a third timescale is required to generate sighs in both models. Furthermore, we identify the similarities of the underlying mechanisms in the two models and the aspects in which they differ.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Professor 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 7 41%
Mathematics 3 18%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 24%