↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating pyrene toxicity on Arctic key copepod species Calanus hyperboreus

Overview of attention for article published in Ecotoxicology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 1,471)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Evaluating pyrene toxicity on Arctic key copepod species Calanus hyperboreus
Published in
Ecotoxicology, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10646-013-1160-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rasmus Dyrmose Nørregaard, Torkel Gissel Nielsen, Eva Friis Møller, Jakob Strand, Laila Espersen, Malene Møhl

Abstract

Calanus hyperboreus is a key species in the Arctic regions because of its abundance and role in the Arctic food web. Exploitation of the off shore oil reserves along Western Greenland is expected in the near future, and it is important to evaluate the acute and chronic effects of oil emissions to the ecosystem. In this study C. hyperboreus females were exposed to concentrations of 0, 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 nM pyrene and saturated concentrations measured to ~300 nM. Daily quantification of egg and faecal pellet production showed significant decreases in the pellet production, while the egg production was unaffected. The hatching success was also unaffected, although the total reproductive output was reduced with increased pyrene concentrations. Accumulation of pyrene in the copepods was higher in feeding than starving females and only trace amounts of the phase I metabolite 1-hydroxypyrene, were found. Lowered reproductive output, reduced grazing, and reduced ability to metabolize pyrene suggest that oil contamination may constitute a risk to C. hyperboreus recruitment, energy transfer in the food web and transfer of pyrene to higher trophic levels.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Unknown 65 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 19%
Researcher 12 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Other 4 6%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 18 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 16 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2014.
All research outputs
#1,602,590
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from Ecotoxicology
#38
of 1,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,553
of 307,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecotoxicology
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,471 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.