| Title |
Hyperoxia provokes a time- and dose-dependent inflammatory response in mechanically ventilated mice, irrespective of tidal volumes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40635-017-0142-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hendrik J. F. Helmerhorst, Laura R. A. Schouten, Gerry T. M. Wagenaar, Nicole P. Juffermans, Joris J. T. H. Roelofs, Marcus J. Schultz, Evert de Jonge, David J. van Westerloo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 13% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 6% |
| Italy | 2 | 6% |
| Brazil | 2 | 6% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Greece | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 19% |
| Unknown | 10 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 59% |
| Scientists | 7 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 52% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,729,085
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#40
of 547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,272
of 328,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 547 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them