RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
Dx accuracy of focused cardiac & venous #US exams in pts w/ shock & suspected #PE https://t.co/g218ICju4G @PNAZARIAN Careggi Univ Hospital
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
Yet another reason I need ultrasound... https://t.co/b4UoqoLrj0
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
No diré nombres....pero sabes de quién hablo 😑 https://t.co/cQ2DG7lLsN
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
@UICBrownCoat @ShanaElisha @USresus4life time to incorporate as our standard of care. https://t.co/AuPPHI2njz
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmts…
In shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Lack of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock (n = 105) https://t.co/kmtsionAr6 #FOAMed
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
Higher sens/spec than prior studies for cardiac POCUS for ?PE, but seems adding DVT scan helps with spec ~100% https://t.co/JsUpeuKG9T
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
POCUS w/ + right heart strain and LE dvt in undif shock = PE. https://t.co/0tZVg6UDdn
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @DocUltrasound: In pts with shock & suspected PE, US for DVT + RHS = 100% spc absence of both = 96% NPV for PE causing shock. #POCUS htt…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
In pts with shock & suspected PE, US for DVT + RHS = 100% spc absence of both = 96% NPV for PE causing shock. #POCUS https://t.co/l3SiJ9pRZT
Interesting study. I wonder about generalizability: time to get both tests vs CTPA. Obvious benefit in terms of rads @e_med_doc @grade1view https://t.co/POWibUFUMB
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
RT @ACEP_EUS: In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmts…
In pts in shock w/ suspected PE, US 4 DVT & RHS = 100% spc. Absence of both = NPV 96% for PE causing shock https://t.co/kmtsionAr6 #FOAMed