↓ Skip to main content

Dis-positioning Euthyphro

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 119)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Dis-positioning Euthyphro
Published in
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11153-017-9632-3
Authors

Ben Page

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 50%
Unspecified 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 1 50%
Unspecified 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2017.
All research outputs
#3,420,611
of 13,597,642 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
#9
of 119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,598
of 266,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,597,642 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them