Title |
Inappropriate prescribing: a systematic overview of published assessment tools
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, September 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00228-013-1575-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Carole P. Kaufmann, Regina Tremp, Kurt E. Hersberger, Markus L. Lampert |
Abstract |
Criteria to assess the appropriateness of prescriptions might serve as a helpful guideline during professional training and in daily practice, with the aim to improve a patient's pharmacotherapy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 3 | 60% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 263 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 54 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 14% |
Researcher | 29 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 7% |
Other | 19 | 7% |
Other | 47 | 18% |
Unknown | 62 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 31% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 63 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
Other | 19 | 7% |
Unknown | 77 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,332,179
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#158
of 2,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,838
of 212,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.