Title |
Physical therapy plus general practitioners’ care versus general practitioners’ care alone for sciatica: a randomised clinical trial with a 12-month follow-up
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Spine Journal, January 2008
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00586-007-0569-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Pim A. J. Luijsterburg, Arianne P. Verhagen, Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo, Hans J. M. M. van den Hoogen, Wilco C. Peul, Cees J. J. Avezaat, Bart W. Koes |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 124 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 22 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 13% |
Other | 11 | 9% |
Researcher | 10 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
Other | 26 | 20% |
Unknown | 31 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 37% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 18% |
Sports and Recreations | 6 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
Other | 11 | 9% |
Unknown | 33 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,803,691
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#156
of 4,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,564
of 156,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,662 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.