| Title |
A case of bilateral Chikungunya neuroretinitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12348-011-0038-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Akshay Gopinathan Nair, Jyotirmay Biswas, Muna P. Bhende |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 23% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 18% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#7,528,880
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection
#40
of 185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,791
of 125,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 185 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them