↓ Skip to main content

Cost-effectiveness of cemented versus cementless total hip arthroplasty. A Markov decision analysis based on implant cost

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 222)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Cost-effectiveness of cemented versus cementless total hip arthroplasty. A Markov decision analysis based on implant cost
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, March 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10195-008-0100-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Marinelli, A. Soccetti, N. Panfoli, L. de Palma

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Bulgaria 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 46 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 40%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 6%
Computer Science 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Unspecified 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 15 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,983,982
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
#40
of 222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,270
of 81,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them