↓ Skip to main content

Proposal for a harmonised PBT identification across different regulatory frameworks

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Sciences Europe, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Proposal for a harmonised PBT identification across different regulatory frameworks
Published in
Environmental Sciences Europe, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/2190-4715-26-9
Authors

Caren Rauert, Anton Friesen, Georgia Hermann, Ulrich Jöhncke, Anja Kehrer, Michael Neumann, Ines Prutz, Jens Schönfeld, Astrid Wiemann, Karen Willhaus, Janina Wöltjen, Sabine Duquesne

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Other 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 5 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 10 48%
Chemistry 3 14%
Unspecified 1 5%
Unknown 7 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2017.
All research outputs
#7,528,880
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Sciences Europe
#209
of 586 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,353
of 227,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Sciences Europe
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 586 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.