| Title |
Exploring the critical factors influencing online lending intentions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Financial Innovation, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40854-015-0010-9 |
| Authors |
Peng Wang, Haichao Zheng, Dongyu Chen, Liangchao Ding |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 132 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 56 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 37 | 28% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 19 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,302,321
of 22,973,051 outputs
Outputs from Financial Innovation
#20
of 157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,286
of 264,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Financial Innovation
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,973,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.