@quantitudepod I add a few texts I personally find to be useful to the topic: - https://t.co/kukxvWMhXW - https://t.co/lJbeHgBy8f - https://t.co/MKC6KuPEMv - https://t.co/ySLXRYmBuH - https://t.co/M5ipX1AuFx - https://t.co/f8ruyFkXLY - https://t.co/qapveUa
RT @PabloGMorato: @mdancho84 The intervals bounded by conformal predictions should be interpreted from a frequentist view? It would be grea…
@mdancho84 The intervals bounded by conformal predictions should be interpreted from a frequentist view? It would be great to clarify this to avoid misguided applications (eg decision-making under uncertainty) https://t.co/3U1gcXnGM6
@grunstrauch @selcukorkmaz Careful though. Confidence intervals have as convoluted a definition as p-values. https://t.co/8BNjXVYLut
Isn't there a magic trick where I can compute Bayesian confidence intervals with flat priors (=frequentist CI), use them for NHST and suddenly can make statements about the error probability for my study (instead of only long-run-frequencies)? https://t.c
@statistickyurad 2/2 Pro lepsi pochopeni KI, resp. procedury odhadu vcetne vysledne interpretace doporucuji nasledujici texty: 1: https://t.co/MKC6Kv7fE3 2: https://t.co/M5ipX1iTgX 3: https://t.co/Sn8FY7LxUF 4: https://t.co/f8ruyF3mno https://t.co/1Y6Yv7t
@skiwskibowski Das ist ein gängiges Missverständnis: Was du beschreibst, wäre ein bayesianisches Credible Interval. Frequentistische Confidence Intervals bedeuten tatsächlich, dass bei n Messungen der wahre Wert in z.B. 95% der berechneten CIs enthalten is
@excelsiorator @KevinGarzuh @Sean__Last Sean already did https://t.co/qqXRycoX34
@jasongfleischer @ai_for_humans pdf free for download 👍 https://t.co/HmTuMoI3qv
Also confidence intervals https://t.co/2Ki8cUKf6H
@Jonas_Esser_ That is not the biggest problem with CI https://t.co/pHPH0D2kYS
@MaskVax @zombietwinkie44 @CamiVgay @Conserve0urWest @estrogenizedboy Er no... You clearly didn't read bro. First years, master students, and psychologists tested on interpretation on CIs - something of which very little is actually known about in regard
@agarwl_ I don't necessarily disagree, but CI's do suffer from similar misinterpretations as NHST (eg. https://t.co/WWw7pmHihV). (And many correct interpretations are essentially just tests in disguise.)
@chris_donegan Perspective/prejudice/theory pretty much always dominates https://t.co/E0s2rDI6gc
"Although all six statements were false, both researchers and students endorsed, on average, more than three statements, indicating a gross misunderstanding " #LiesDamnLies https://t.co/4vSxGB8of1
Confidence intervals are hard. When shown a paper that said "the 95% CI for the mean was 0.1 to 0.4," a mix of Dutch psychology students (bachelors, masters, and PhD/faculty) judged six possible statements about the CI as true or false. Study: https://t.c
@sadneurons @richarddmorey @statsepi Not co-authored with @statsepi, but do you mean like this: https://t.co/iSdRJrvxAY or this: https://t.co/k0VOl3Nbmp or this: https://t.co/fqjKgxedfw or this: https://t.co/9IdKkJbP6x ?
We do need to remember Professor Bumbledorf https://t.co/x7nzqRBBOB
@lakens @wolfvanpaemel @olivier_klein @akis88590653 I given this quiz on the definition of the confidence interval whenever I give a talk: https://t.co/nMYKXcVFqe. The best score has been 4/6 question right. If CIs aren't actually understood by most practi
Here's a quick quiz (solution in link): Which of these statements about a confidence interval are true?
RT @jvrbntz: "it is incorrect to interpret a CI as the probability that the true value is within the interval" https://t.co/etOLWHStbZ
RT @jvrbntz: "it is incorrect to interpret a CI as the probability that the true value is within the interval" https://t.co/etOLWHStbZ
@NicoleBarbaro @phl43 It is interesting how we can draw on concepts from other fields, yet misunderstand/misapply them. Scientists' use of concepts from PhilofSci would be just one example. Another interesting area is how scientists (mis?)interpret statist
...and when thinking about compatibility intervals we should probably also remind ourselves about Professor Bumbledorf https://t.co/YRjur6WfBr https://t.co/rkxAEDLVgp
@annemscheel Maybe it is extremely easy for you to interpret NHST. But I think a Bayesian approach, besides all the other advantages, makes it a lot easier to interpret the results as the majority of researchers misinterprets NHST results https://t.co/gNIi
@RamonNogueras Bueno, ninguna ciencia es perfecta... https://t.co/V1UI25dcZr, https://t.co/lu06Jsq2YW, https://t.co/vdgQrAVWZr, https://t.co/5d0LJI6d1T !
RT @jvrbntz: "it is incorrect to interpret a CI as the probability that the true value is within the interval" https://t.co/etOLWHStbZ
RT @BenMazer: Certainly proves my point...also they gave people a list of six interpretations of confidence intervals and ALL OF THEM were…
Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals https://t.co/sB2C8THa2d
RT @BrendanNyhan: Evidence of how even academics frequently misinterpret confidence intervals https://t.co/poOYDgi6Fx
Straight from the Holy Effing Sh** Department: https://t.co/gGbRrt2wJT
Evidence of how even academics frequently misinterpret confidence intervals https://t.co/poOYDgi6Fx
@jessenleon @StatModeling That statement is incorrect too, although quite common. (https://t.co/XaYM9SxsTN)
@cbokhove @f2harrell The authors also mention supplementing p-values with CI's around effect sizes. But like p-values we tend to misinterpret those as well: https://t.co/UDRNBdrYEc
RT @jvrbntz: "it is incorrect to interpret a Confidence Interval as the probability that the true value is within the interval" https://t.c…
RT @jvrbntz: "it is incorrect to interpret a CI as the probability that the true value is within the interval" https://t.co/etOLWHStbZ
"it is incorrect to interpret a Confidence Interval as the probability that the true value is within the interval" https://t.co/eIB1sWjWzk https://t.co/BbhSwpn57P
"it is incorrect to interpret a Confidence Interval as the probability that the true value is within the interval" https://t.co/eIB1sWjWzk https://t.co/BdIlpPx1YR
"it is incorrect to interpret a Confidence Interval as the probability that the true value is within the interval" https://t.co/VuHFugB63f
RT @jvrbntz: "it is incorrect to interpret a CI as the probability that the true value is within the interval" https://t.co/etOLWHStbZ
"it is incorrect to interpret a CI as the probability that the true value is within the interval" https://t.co/etOLWHStbZ
Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals http://t.co/zsKrnz2bvR
Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals http://t.co/PrHRYOwgIr
Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals http://t.co/PrHRYOwgIr
:( Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals http://t.co/WFr0oLuUEo #springerlink
@kazuyainoue @partagnan 信頼区間=「95%の確率で母集団の平均が含まれると考えられる範囲」は誤りですね。研究者も信頼区間を誤解しているという論文で先日みたばかりです。http://t.co/tpUJLphaRm
Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals, via @Keith_Laws http://t.co/i49mHLL0OD http://t.co/Mepavi01v0
What is a confidence interval? http://t.co/BugrjhuqyR
What is a confidence interval? http://t.co/BugrjhuqyR
What is a confidence interval? http://t.co/BugrjhuqyR
I see that Miss Interpretation is still very popular...http://t.co/9SxPabmtBO
Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals http://t.co/5xKlsj2wdi #datascience #datamining #bioinformatics
Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals http://t.co/5xKlsj2wdi #datascience #datamining #bioinformatics
Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals, via @Keith_Laws http://t.co/i49mHLL0OD http://t.co/Mepavi01v0
Scientists fail to understand NHST/CIs? Or statisticians fail to create tools to answer scientists' actual questions? http://t.co/tgO7xYDA2K
Scientists fail to understand NHST/CIs? Or statisticians fail to create tools to answer scientists' actual questions? http://t.co/tgO7xYDA2K
Scientists fail to understand NHST/CIs? Or statisticians fail to create tools to answer scientists' actual questions? http://t.co/tgO7xYDA2K
Scientists fail to understand NHST/CIs? Or statisticians fail to create tools to answer scientists' actual questions? http://t.co/tgO7xYDA2K
Scientists fail to understand NHST/CIs? Or statisticians fail to create tools to answer scientists' actual questions? http://t.co/tgO7xYDA2K
Scientists fail to understand NHST/CIs? Or statisticians fail to create tools to answer scientists' actual questions? http://t.co/tgO7xYDA2K
The "new statistics" might require an interpretation learning curve. Scientists and students alike misinterpret CIs http://t.co/eGOWyyaMNr”
Scientists fail to understand NHST/CIs? Or statisticians fail to create tools to answer scientists' actual questions? http://t.co/tgO7xYDA2K
CI misinterpretation, problem in #psych, I'm curious about the participant pool. http://t.co/2OAJaSZRzE @Keith_Laws #facepalm
CI misinterpretation, problem in #psych, I'm curious about the participant pool. http://t.co/2OAJaSZRzE @Keith_Laws #facepalm
“@Keith_Laws: Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals http://t.co/8Cv9x75js7 ..> yeah probably. but q'airre open to response bias?
Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals, via @Keith_Laws http://t.co/i49mHLL0OD http://t.co/Mepavi01v0
CI misinterpretation, problem in #psych, I'm curious about the participant pool. http://t.co/2OAJaSZRzE @Keith_Laws #facepalm
Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals, via @Keith_Laws http://t.co/i49mHLL0OD http://t.co/Mepavi01v0
Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals, via @Keith_Laws http://t.co/i49mHLL0OD http://t.co/Mepavi01v0
Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals, via @Keith_Laws http://t.co/i49mHLL0OD http://t.co/Mepavi01v0
“@Keith_Laws: Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals http://t.co/8Cv9x75js7 ..> yeah probably. but q'airre open to response bias?
Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals http://t.co/iE8I3mqdcG "indicate "a serious problem in scientific practice"- in psychology!
Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals, via @Keith_Laws http://t.co/i49mHLL0OD http://t.co/Mepavi01v0
Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals http://t.co/iE8I3mqdcG "indicate "a serious problem in scientific practice"- in psychology!
Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals http://t.co/iE8I3mqdcG "indicate "a serious problem in scientific practice"- in psychology!
Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals http://t.co/iE8I3mqdcG "indicate "a serious problem in scientific practice"- in psychology!
Psychology students and researchers grossly misunderstand confidence intervals. http://t.co/CGky7C7v7c
Psychology students and researchers grossly misunderstand confidence intervals. http://t.co/CGky7C7v7c
Psychology students and researchers grossly misunderstand confidence intervals. http://t.co/CGky7C7v7c
@GustafRydevik http://t.co/OjpAXWh4Jr ge mailadress om du inte har access
Confidence intervals are often misinterpreted *: http://t.co/v7wNTIy7vh * by psychologists, at least.
Confidence intervals are often misinterpreted *: http://t.co/v7wNTIy7vh * by psychologists, at least.
Confidence intervals are often misinterpreted *: http://t.co/v7wNTIy7vh * by psychologists, at least.
Confidence intervals are often misinterpreted *: http://t.co/v7wNTIy7vh * by psychologists, at least.
Confidence intervals are often misinterpreted *: http://t.co/v7wNTIy7vh * by psychologists, at least.
Researchers endorse 3/6 false statements about confidence intervals. Does not bode well for #TheNewStatistics |$| http://t.co/XR0g4gMsu9
Both students and staff grossly misinterpret confidence intervals. (PBR) http://t.co/F8SGZFnXlj
Both students and staff grossly misinterpret confidence intervals. (PBR) http://t.co/F8SGZFnXlj
This is... troubling. RT @kylejasmin: Both students and staff grossly misinterpret confidence intervals. (PBR) http://t.co/eJ9AioXnlT
Both students and staff grossly misinterpret confidence intervals. (PBR) http://t.co/F8SGZFnXlj