↓ Skip to main content

Untargeted metabolomic analysis of tomato pollen development and heat stress response

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Reproduction, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Untargeted metabolomic analysis of tomato pollen development and heat stress response
Published in
Plant Reproduction, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00497-017-0301-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marine J. Paupière, Florian Müller, Hanjing Li, Ivo Rieu, Yury M. Tikunov, Richard G. F. Visser, Arnaud G. Bovy

Abstract

Pollen development metabolomics. Developing pollen is among the plant structures most sensitive to high temperatures, and a decrease in pollen viability is often associated with an alteration of metabolite content. Most of the metabolic studies of pollen have focused on a specific group of compounds, which limits the identification of physiologically important metabolites. To get a better insight into pollen development and the pollen heat stress response, we used a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry platform to detect secondary metabolites in pollen of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) at three developmental stages under control conditions and after a short heat stress at 38 °C. Under control conditions, the young microspores accumulated a large amount of alkaloids and polyamines, whereas the mature pollen strongly accumulated flavonoids. The heat stress treatment led to accumulation of flavonoids in the microspore. The biological role of the detected metabolites is discussed. This study provides the first untargeted metabolomic analysis of developing pollen under a changing environment that can serve as reference for further studies.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 27%
Unspecified 10 24%
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 46%
Unspecified 10 24%
Chemistry 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Other 2 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,326,908
of 13,560,201 outputs
Outputs from Plant Reproduction
#31
of 94 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,324
of 264,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Reproduction
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,560,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them