↓ Skip to main content

Implications of overestimated anthropogenic CO2 emissions on East Asian and global land CO2 flux inversion

Overview of attention for article published in Geoscience Letters, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Implications of overestimated anthropogenic CO2 emissions on East Asian and global land CO2 flux inversion
Published in
Geoscience Letters, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40562-017-0074-7
Authors

Tazu Saeki, Prabir K. Patra

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Other 6 10%
Professor 5 8%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 11 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 22 37%
Environmental Science 7 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Chemical Engineering 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 16 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2018.
All research outputs
#14,345,967
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from Geoscience Letters
#76
of 192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,705
of 310,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geoscience Letters
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 192 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.