↓ Skip to main content

Acceptance of Evolution Increases with Student Academic Level: A Comparison Between a Secular and a Religious College

Overview of attention for article published in Evolution: Education and Outreach, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 video uploader

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Acceptance of Evolution Increases with Student Academic Level: A Comparison Between a Secular and a Religious College
Published in
Evolution: Education and Outreach, December 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12052-009-0175-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guillermo Paz-y-Miño C., Avelina Espinosa

Abstract

Acceptance of evolution among the general public, high schools, teachers, and scientists has been documented in the USA; little is known about college students' views on evolution; this population is relevant since it transits from a high-school/parent-protective environment to an independent role in societal decisions. Here we compare perspectives about evolution, creationism, and intelligent design (ID) between a secular (S) and a religious (R) college in the Northeastern USA. Interinstitutional comparisons showed that 64% (mean S + R) biology majors vs. 42/62% (S/R) nonmajors supported the exclusive teaching of evolution in science classes; 24/29% (S/R) biology majors vs. 26/38% (S/R) nonmajors perceived ID as both alternative to evolution and/or scientific theory about the origin of life; 76% (mean S + R) biology majors and nonmajors accepted evolutionary explanations about the origin of life; 86% (mean S + R) biology majors vs. 79% (mean S + R) nonmajors preferred science courses where human evolution is discussed; 76% (mean S+R) biology majors vs. 79% (mean S + R) nonmajors welcomed questions about evolution in exams and/or thought that such questions should always be in exams; and 66% (mean S + R) biology majors vs. 46% (mean S + R) nonmajors admitted they accept evolution openly and/or privately. Intrainstitutional comparisons showed that overall acceptance of evolution among biologists (S or R) increased gradually from the freshman to the senior year, due to exposure to upper-division courses with evolutionary content. College curricular/pedagogical reform should fortify evolution literacy at all education levels, particularly among nonbiologists.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 6%
Thailand 1 3%
Italy 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 25 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 19%
Student > Master 5 16%
Professor 3 10%
Lecturer 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Other 11 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 52%
Social Sciences 5 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 6 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2018.
All research outputs
#3,046,005
of 11,346,801 outputs
Outputs from Evolution: Education and Outreach
#374
of 807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,228
of 198,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolution: Education and Outreach
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,346,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 807 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.