| Title |
Ankle fusion with centralisation of the fibula after distal tibia bone tumour resection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10195-013-0279-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zile Singh Kundu, Paritosh Gogna, Vinay Gupta, Rohit Singla, Sukhbir Singh Sangwan, Mukul Mohindra, Amanpreet Singh |
| Abstract |
Management of distal tibial tumours with limb salvage surgery poses a challenge for the orthopaedic surgeon. This study was done to evaluate the results of fibular centralisation as a technique to reconstruct defects that occurred after resection at this site. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 13 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 59% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2013.
All research outputs
#16,067,622
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
#125
of 222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,382
of 313,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.