↓ Skip to main content

Usability of mobile applications: literature review and rationale for a new usability model

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Interaction Science, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
404 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1432 Mendeley
Title
Usability of mobile applications: literature review and rationale for a new usability model
Published in
Journal of Interaction Science, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/2194-0827-1-1
Authors

Rachel Harrison, Derek Flood, David Duce

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,432 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 12 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Other 16 1%
Unknown 1384 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 296 21%
Student > Master 295 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 174 12%
Researcher 85 6%
Lecturer 66 5%
Other 232 16%
Unknown 284 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 623 44%
Social Sciences 95 7%
Engineering 92 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 84 6%
Design 48 3%
Other 179 13%
Unknown 311 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,438,092
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Interaction Science
#5
of 10 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,195
of 280,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Interaction Science
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one scored the same or higher as 5 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.