↓ Skip to main content

Usability of mobile applications: literature review and rationale for a new usability model

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Interaction Science, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
373 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1351 Mendeley
Title
Usability of mobile applications: literature review and rationale for a new usability model
Published in
Journal of Interaction Science, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/2194-0827-1-1
Authors

Rachel Harrison, Derek Flood, David Duce

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,351 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 12 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Other 16 1%
Unknown 1303 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 290 21%
Student > Master 289 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 167 12%
Researcher 82 6%
Lecturer 64 5%
Other 207 15%
Unknown 252 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 612 45%
Social Sciences 91 7%
Engineering 87 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 80 6%
Design 48 4%
Other 154 11%
Unknown 279 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2019.
All research outputs
#6,809,491
of 20,995,223 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Interaction Science
#5
of 10 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,380
of 302,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Interaction Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,995,223 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one scored the same or higher as 5 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them