↓ Skip to main content

Usability of mobile applications: literature review and rationale for a new usability model

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Interaction Science, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
466 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1581 Mendeley
Title
Usability of mobile applications: literature review and rationale for a new usability model
Published in
Journal of Interaction Science, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/2194-0827-1-1
Authors

Rachel Harrison, Derek Flood, David Duce

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,581 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 12 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Other 16 1%
Unknown 1533 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 305 19%
Student > Bachelor 300 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 180 11%
Researcher 88 6%
Lecturer 68 4%
Other 227 14%
Unknown 413 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 643 41%
Engineering 98 6%
Social Sciences 97 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 86 5%
Design 50 3%
Other 166 10%
Unknown 441 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Interaction Science
#5
of 10 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,080
of 205,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Interaction Science
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one scored the same or higher as 5 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.