| Title |
„Doing Gender“ im Altenpflegeheim
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00391-016-1147-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elisabeth Reitinger, Erich Lehner, Barbara Pichler, Katharina Heimerl |
| Abstract |
"Doing gender" plays an important role in nursing interactions in long-term care settings. The aim of this article is to focus on the experiences of staff and management in a long-term care setting on the social categorization of gender and to reflect and discuss these findings against already existing research. Within a qualitative study, one to one interviews and group discussions with a total of 28 participants were conducted. The results show how "doing gender" as a social practice effects interactions with residents, within the working team and in the context of management and hierarchy in the long-term care setting. In interactions with residents, gender-specific behavior can be observed. Within the working team gender-specific differences with respect to division of labor and working hours are reported. Concerning management and hierarchy it can be observed that male executives react more strongly in correspondence with the expectations of their gender role whereas female executives show more discrepancies between the expectations towards their position and gender role. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 40% |
| Researcher | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 20% |
| Psychology | 1 | 20% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 20% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2017.
All research outputs
#20,420,242
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie
#290
of 364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,591
of 314,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 364 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.