↓ Skip to main content

Enhanced methane production of vinegar residue by response surface methodology (RSM)

Overview of attention for article published in AMB Express, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Enhanced methane production of vinegar residue by response surface methodology (RSM)
Published in
AMB Express, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13568-017-0392-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiayu Feng, Jiyu Zhang, Jiafu Zhang, Yanfeng He, Ruihong Zhang, Chang Chen, Guangqing Liu

Abstract

As the by-product of the vinegar production process, a large number of vinegar residue has been abandoned and caused a serious environmental pollution. Anaerobic digestion has been proved to be able to dispose and convert vinegar residue into bioenergy but still need to improve the efficiency. This study applied central composite design of response surface methodology to investigate the influences of feed to inoculum ratio, organic loading, and initial pH on methane production and optimize anaerobic digestion condition. The maximum methane yield of 203.91 mL gVS(-1) and biodegradability of 46.99% were obtained at feed to inoculum ratio of 0.5, organic loading of 31.49 gVS L(-1), and initial pH of 7.29, which was considered as the best condition. It has a very significant improvement of 69.48% for methane production and 52.02% for biodegradability compared with our previous study. Additionally, a high methane yield of 182.09 mL gVS(-1) was obtained at feed to inoculum ratio of 1.5, organic loading of 46.22 gVS L(-1), and initial pH of 7.32. And it is more appropriate to apply this condition in industrial application owing to the high feed to inoculum ratio and organic loading. Besides, a significant interaction was found between feed to inoculum ratio and organic loading. This study maximized the methane production of vinegar residue and made a good foundation for further study and future industrial application.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Thailand 1 2%
Unknown 52 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 23%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 18 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 8 15%
Engineering 8 15%
Chemical Engineering 6 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 21 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2017.
All research outputs
#15,459,013
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from AMB Express
#445
of 1,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,001
of 310,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AMB Express
#33
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,237 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.