| Title |
Investigation of the effectiveness of the “Girls on the Go!” program for building self-esteem in young women: trial protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
SpringerPlus, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2193-1801-2-683 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Loredana Tirlea, Helen Truby, Terry P Haines |
| Abstract |
Body Image is a major factor affecting health in a range of age groups, but has particular significance for adolescents. The aim of this research is to evaluate the efficacy of the "Girls on the Go!" program delivered outside of the school environment by health professionals to girls at risk of developing poor self-esteem on the outcomes of self-esteem, impairment induced by eating disorders, body satisfaction, self-efficacy, and dieting behaviour. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 26 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 18 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 33 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2014.
All research outputs
#17,706,524
of 22,736,112 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#1,203
of 1,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,216
of 306,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#59
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,736,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.