↓ Skip to main content

What are the health benefits of physical activity in type 1 diabetes mellitus? A literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
343 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
613 Mendeley
Title
What are the health benefits of physical activity in type 1 diabetes mellitus? A literature review
Published in
Diabetologia, December 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00125-011-2403-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Chimen, A. Kennedy, K. Nirantharakumar, T. T. Pang, R. Andrews, P. Narendran

Abstract

Physical activity improves well-being and reduces the risk of heart disease, cancer and type 2 diabetes mellitus in the general population. In individuals with established type 2 diabetes, physical activity improves glucose and lipid levels, reduces weight and improves insulin resistance. In type 1 diabetes mellitus, however, the benefits of physical activity are less clear. There is poor evidence for a beneficial effect of physical activity on glycaemic control and microvascular complications, and significant risk of harm through hypoglycaemia. Here we review the literature relating to physical activity and health in type 1 diabetes. We examine its effect on a number of outcomes, including glycaemic control, lipids, blood pressure, diabetic complications, well-being and overall mortality. We conclude that whilst there is sufficient evidence to recommend physical activity in the management of type 1 diabetes, it is still unclear as to what form, duration and intensity should be recommended and whether there is benefit for many of the outcomes examined.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 613 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 597 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 108 18%
Student > Master 80 13%
Researcher 50 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 8%
Student > Postgraduate 43 7%
Other 119 19%
Unknown 163 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 147 24%
Sports and Recreations 78 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 66 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 4%
Psychology 24 4%
Other 92 15%
Unknown 179 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,906,212
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#1,014
of 5,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,936
of 252,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#6
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.