| Title |
Invasive fungal tracheobronchitis in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: underlying conditions, diagnosis, and outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-016-0230-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chun-Yu Lin, Wei-Lun Liu, Che-Chia Chang, Hou-Tai Chang, Han-Chung Hu, Kuo-chin Kao, Ning-Hung Chen, Ying-Jen Chen, Cheng-Ta Yang, Chung-Chi Huang, George Dimopoulos |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 36% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 20% |
| Unknown | 7 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 49% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 11 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2017.
All research outputs
#20,418,183
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#963
of 1,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#355,808
of 420,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#18
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,050 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.