| Title |
MR-arthrography and CT-arthrography in sports-related glenolabral injuries: a matched descriptive illustration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Insights into Imaging, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13244-015-0462-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mohamed Jarraya, Frank W. Roemer, Heather I. Gale, Philippe Landreau, Pieter D’Hooghe, Ali Guermazi |
| Abstract |
The combination of a large range of motion and insufficient bony stabilization makes the glenohumeral joint susceptible to injuries including dislocation in young athletes. Magnetic resonance arthrography (MR-arthrography) and computed tomography arthrography (CT-arthrography) play an important role in the preoperative workup of labroligametous injuries. This paper illustrates MR-arthrography and CT-arthrography findings acquired at the same time on the same subjects to illustrate common causes and sequelae of shoulder instability. Teaching Points • MR-arthrography and CT-arthrography are equivalent for SLAP and full-thickness rotator cuff tears.• CT-arthrography is superior in evaluating osseous defects and cartilage surface lesions.• MR-arthrography is superior in evaluating intrasubstance and extra-articular tendinous injuries. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Colombia | 1 | 25% |
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 24% |
| Unknown | 10 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 57% |
| Engineering | 4 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2022.
All research outputs
#14,090,405
of 24,907,378 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#544
of 1,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,326
of 405,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,907,378 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.