↓ Skip to main content

Stabilization of Memory States by Stochastic Facilitating Synapses

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Stabilization of Memory States by Stochastic Facilitating Synapses
Published in
The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/2190-8567-3-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Miller

Abstract

Bistability within a small neural circuit can arise through an appropriate strength of excitatory recurrent feedback. The stability of a state of neural activity, measured by the mean dwelling time before a noise-induced transition to another state, depends on the neural firing-rate curves, the net strength of excitatory feedback, the statistics of spike times, and increases exponentially with the number of equivalent neurons in the circuit. Here, we show that such stability is greatly enhanced by synaptic facilitation and reduced by synaptic depression. We take into account the alteration in times of synaptic vesicle release, by calculating distributions of inter-release intervals of a synapse, which differ from the distribution of its incoming interspike intervals when the synapse is dynamic. In particular, release intervals produced by a Poisson spike train have a coefficient of variation greater than one when synapses are probabilistic and facilitating, whereas the coefficient of variation is less than one when synapses are depressing. However, in spite of the increased variability in postsynaptic input produced by facilitating synapses, their dominant effect is reduced synaptic efficacy at low input rates compared to high rates, which increases the curvature of neural input-output functions, leading to wider regions of bistability in parameter space and enhanced lifetimes of memory states. Our results are based on analytic methods with approximate formulae and bolstered by simulations of both Poisson processes and of circuits of noisy spiking model neurons.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 7%
Hungary 1 3%
Switzerland 1 3%
Unknown 25 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 31%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Professor 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 24%
Neuroscience 5 17%
Mathematics 4 14%
Psychology 3 10%
Engineering 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 4 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2013.
All research outputs
#6,740,287
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience
#9
of 79 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,097
of 319,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them