↓ Skip to main content

Psychiatric patients’ views on why their involuntary hospitalisation was right or wrong: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Psychiatric patients’ views on why their involuntary hospitalisation was right or wrong: a qualitative study
Published in
Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00127-011-0427-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina Katsakou, Diana Rose, Tim Amos, Len Bowers, Rosemarie McCabe, Danielle Oliver, Til Wykes, Stefan Priebe

Abstract

To explore involuntary patients' retrospective views on why their hospitalisation was right or wrong.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 2 3%
Denmark 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Unknown 75 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Student > Bachelor 12 15%
Researcher 10 13%
Unspecified 9 11%
Other 18 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 29%
Psychology 21 26%
Social Sciences 16 20%
Unspecified 11 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Other 3 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2016.
All research outputs
#1,853,275
of 13,395,878 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology
#388
of 1,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,613
of 250,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology
#7
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,395,878 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.