↓ Skip to main content

Systemic and microcirculatory effects of blood transfusion in experimental hemorrhagic shock

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Systemic and microcirculatory effects of blood transfusion in experimental hemorrhagic shock
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, April 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40635-017-0136-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gonzalo Ferrara, Vanina S. Kanoore Edul, Héctor S. Canales, Enrique Martins, Carlos Canullán, Gastón Murias, Mario O. Pozo, Juan F. Caminos Eguillor, María G. Buscetti, Can Ince, Arnaldo Dubin

Abstract

The microvascular reperfusion injury after retransfusion has not been completely characterized. Specifically, the question of heterogeneity among different microvascular beds needs to be addressed. In addition, the identification of anaerobic metabolism is elusive. The venoarterial PCO2 to arteriovenous oxygen content difference ratio (Pv-aCO2/Ca-vO2) might be a surrogate for respiratory quotient, but this has not been validated. Therefore, our goal was to characterize sublingual and intestinal (mucosal and serosal) microvascular injury after blood resuscitation in hemorrhagic shock and its relation with O2 and CO2 metabolism. Anesthetized and mechanically ventilated sheep were assigned to stepwise bleeding and blood retransfusion (n = 10) and sham (n = 7) groups. We performed analysis of expired gases, arterial and mixed venous blood gases, and intestinal and sublingual videomicroscopy. In the bleeding group during the last step of hemorrhage, and compared to the sham group, there were decreases in oxygen consumption (3.7 [2.8-4.6] vs. 6.8 [5.8-8.0] mL min(-1) kg(-1), P < 0.001) and increases in respiratory quotient (0.96 [0.91-1.06] vs. 0.72 [0.69-0.77], P < 0.001). Retransfusion normalized these variables. The Pv-aCO2/Ca-vO2 increased in the last step of bleeding (2.4 [2.0-2.8] vs. 1.1 [1.0-1.3], P < 0.001) and remained elevated after retransfusion, compared to the sham group (1.8 [1.5-2.0] vs. 1.1 [0.9-1.3], P < 0.001). Pv-aCO2/Ca-vO2 had a weak correlation with respiratory quotient (Spearman R = 0.42, P < 0.001). All the intestinal and sublingual microcirculatory variables were affected during hemorrhage and improved after retransfusion. The recovery was only complete for intestinal red blood cell velocity and sublingual total and perfused vascular densities. Although there were some minor differences, intestinal and sublingual microcirculation behaved similarly. Therefore, sublingual mucosa might be an adequate window to track intestinal microvascular reperfusion injury. Additionally, Pv-aCO2/Ca-vO2 was poorly correlated with respiratory quotient, and its physiologic behavior was different. Thus, it might be a misleading surrogate for anaerobic metabolism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 10%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 11 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 52%
Psychology 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 12 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2017.
All research outputs
#6,368,841
of 23,299,593 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#142
of 458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,338
of 310,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,299,593 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 458 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.