Title |
Addressing health literacy in patient decision aids
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, November 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-13-s2-s10 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kirsten J McCaffery, Margaret Holmes-Rovner, Sian K Smith, David Rovner, Don Nutbeam, Marla L Clayman, Karen Kelly-Blake, Michael S Wolf, Stacey L Sheridan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 50% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
Australia | 1 | 6% |
Japan | 1 | 6% |
India | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 63% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 19% |
Scientists | 3 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Philippines | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 288 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 55 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 13% |
Student > Master | 36 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 6% |
Other | 76 | 26% |
Unknown | 53 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 87 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 12% |
Social Sciences | 25 | 8% |
Psychology | 22 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
Other | 45 | 15% |
Unknown | 75 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2015.
All research outputs
#4,071,426
of 25,295,968 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#319
of 2,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,964
of 320,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#11
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,295,968 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.