| Title |
Discriminative histogram taxonomy features for snake species identification
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13673-014-0003-0 |
| Authors |
Alex Pappachen James, Bincy Mathews, Sherin Sugathan, Dileep Kumar Raveendran |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kazakhstan | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 30% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 20% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2016.
All research outputs
#20,414,746
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences
#70
of 78 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,070
of 225,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 78 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them