| Title |
Noninvasive k3 estimation method for slow dissociation PET ligands: application to [11C]Pittsburgh compound B
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EJNMMI Research, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2191-219x-3-76 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Koichi Sato, Kiyoshi Fukushi, Hitoshi Shinotoh, Hitoshi Shimada, Shigeki Hirano, Noriko Tanaka, Tetsuya Suhara, Toshiaki Irie, Hiroshi Ito |
| Abstract |
Recently, we reported an information density theory and an analysis of three-parameter plus shorter scan than conventional method (3P+) for the amyloid-binding ligand [11C]Pittsburgh compound B (PIB) as an example of a non-highly reversible positron emission tomography (PET) ligand. This article describes an extension of 3P + analysis to noninvasive '3P++' analysis (3P + plus use of a reference tissue for input function). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 33% |
| Researcher | 3 | 25% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 42% |
| Psychology | 2 | 17% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 17% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2013.
All research outputs
#15,285,728
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from EJNMMI Research
#253
of 555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,015
of 187,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EJNMMI Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 555 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them