Title |
An effective bioremediation approach for enhanced microbial degradation of the veterinary antibiotic sulfamethazine in an agricultural soil
|
---|---|
Published in |
Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, October 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40538-016-0080-6 |
Authors |
Natalie Hirth, Edward Topp, Ulrike Dörfler, Erhard Stupperich, Jean Charles Munch, Reiner Schroll |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 43 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 16% |
Unknown | 18 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 23% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 14% |
Engineering | 5 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 17 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2017.
All research outputs
#5,935,398
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture
#16
of 125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,573
of 316,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them