| Title |
Effect of bioeffectors and recycled P-fertiliser products on the growth of spring wheat
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40538-016-0074-4 |
| Authors |
Jonas Duus Stevens Lekfeldt, Martin Rex, Filip Mercl, Martin Kulhánek, Pavel Tlustoš, Jakob Magid, Andreas de Neergaard |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 23% |
| Researcher | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 38% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2017.
All research outputs
#5,935,398
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture
#16
of 125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,674
of 336,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them