↓ Skip to main content

The cardiovascular system and the biochemistry of grafts used in heart surgery

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
The cardiovascular system and the biochemistry of grafts used in heart surgery
Published in
SpringerPlus, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-2-612
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suna Aydin, Suleyman Aydin, Mehmet Nesimi Eren, İbrahim Sahin, Musa Yilmaz, Mehmet Kalayci, Orhan Gungor

Abstract

Blood is pumped into the cardiac muscle through arteries called the coronary arteries. Over time, the accumulation of cholesterol, coagulation factors, and cells on the walls of these arteries causes the walls to thicken and lose their elasticity, resulting in the development of atherosclerosis. When the blood supply of the heart is diminished by atherosclerosis, it can be restored by bypass surgery, in which atherosclerosis-free vein and/or artery grafts taken from another area of the body are used to replace the atherosclerotic vessels. These biological grafts used in surgery differ in biochemical composition and long-term patency. Although the great saphenous vein (GSV) has been the most popular graft material in revascularization for years, it has recently been superseded by the internal mammarian artery (IMA), which has a lower incidence of recurrence of atherosclerosis. The aim of the present review is briefly to address the structure of the cardiovascular system and blood vessels, and then, in the light recent data, to present the biochemical compositions and individual advantages of the graft materials used to restore an impaired blood supply to the heart.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Researcher 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 12 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Engineering 5 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 13 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2013.
All research outputs
#21,172,363
of 23,822,306 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#1,478
of 1,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,049
of 189,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#90
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,822,306 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.