| Title |
Evidence for myofibril remodeling as opposed to myofibril damage in human muscles with DOMS: an ultrastructural and immunoelectron microscopic study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Histochemistry and Cell Biology, February 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00418-004-0625-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ji-Guo Yu, Lena Carlsson, Lars-Eric Thornell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 44% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 142 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 16% |
| Researcher | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Professor | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 18% |
| Unknown | 29 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 44 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 8% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 36 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2022.
All research outputs
#6,428,364
of 25,853,983 outputs
Outputs from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#235
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,113
of 63,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,853,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them