| Title |
Agreement of tricuspid annular systolic excursion measurement between transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in the perioperative setting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10554-017-1128-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna Flo Forner, Elham Hasheminejad, Sergi Sabate, Michael A. Ackermann, Edwin W. Turton, Joerg Ender |
| Abstract |
The aim of our study was to evaluate the level of agreement between tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and TAPSE measured using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in anesthetized patients. Thirty patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery were prospectively studied. Shortly after induction of anesthesia before the operation, TAPSE was measured by TTE using M-mode in apical 4chamber view (4CH) and by TEE in six different views: using 2D echocardiography in midesophageal (ME) 4CH view, using M-mode in deep transgastric right ventricle (dTG RV) view at 0° and dTG RV longaxis view (LAX) as well as using anatomical M-mode (AM-mode) in ME 4CH, dTG RV at 0° and dTG RV LAX views. Bland-Altman analysis showed a good agreement for TAPSE measured using M-mode in TTE and using AM-mode in TEE in the ME 4CH and dTG RV at 0° views (-2.5 ± 18 and -2.2 ± 14% respectively). The agreement between TAPSE measured in TTE and TEE using 2D in ME 4CH, using M-mode in dT GRV 0° and using M-mode and AM-mode in dTG RV LAX view showed a significant systematic underestimation of the measurements (-8.8 ± 21, -8.8 ± 24, -17.8 ± 28 and -6.4 ± 20%). Our study showed that the right ventricular function can be accurately and precisely estimated using TAPSE measurement by TEE in the midesophageal four chamber and deep transgastric right ventricle view at 0° using anatomical M-mode. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 25% |
| Researcher | 4 | 20% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 75% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2017.
All research outputs
#16,725,651
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#802
of 2,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,896
of 324,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#16
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.