↓ Skip to main content

Landslide hazard assessment: recent trends and techniques

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
376 Mendeley
Title
Landslide hazard assessment: recent trends and techniques
Published in
SpringerPlus, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-2-523
Authors

Sudhakar D Pardeshi, Sumant E Autade, Suchitra S Pardeshi

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 376 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 371 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 66 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 16%
Student > Bachelor 52 14%
Researcher 46 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 4%
Other 59 16%
Unknown 77 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 119 32%
Engineering 69 18%
Environmental Science 39 10%
Computer Science 11 3%
Social Sciences 10 3%
Other 34 9%
Unknown 94 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2013.
All research outputs
#10,729,556
of 16,752,553 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#920
of 1,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,516
of 190,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#168
of 299 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,752,553 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,807 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 299 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.