↓ Skip to main content

A novel antifungal protein of Bacillus subtilis B25

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
A novel antifungal protein of Bacillus subtilis B25
Published in
SpringerPlus, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-2-543
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhiqiong Tan, Baoying Lin, Rongyi Zhang

Abstract

Bacillus subtilis B25 was isolated from banana rhizosphere soil. It has been confirmed for B25 to have stronger antagonism against Fusarium oxysporum f.sp.cubense, Additionally B25 has good inhibitory to plant pathogens, including Corynespora cassiicola, Alternaria solani, Botrytis cinerea and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides on potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates. The antagonistic substance can be extracted from cell-free culture broth supernatants by 70% (w/v) (NH4)2 SO4 saturation. Clear blank band was observed between the protein and a pathogen. The examination of antagonistic mechanism under light microscope showed that the antifungal protein of B25 appeared to inhibit pathogens by leading to mycelium and spores tumescence, distortion, abnormality. The isolation procedure comprised ion exchange chromatography on DEAE-Sephadex Fast Flow and gel filtration chromatography on SephadexG-100. The purified antifungal fraction showed a single band in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The active fraction was identified by NanoLC-ESI-MS/MS The amino acid sequences of 17 peptides segments were obtained. The analysis of the protein suggested that it was a hypothetical protein (gi154685475), with a relative molecular mass of 38708.67 Da and isoelectric point (pI) of 5.63.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
India 1 2%
Unknown 48 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 58%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 10 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2021.
All research outputs
#6,396,976
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#394
of 1,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,042
of 211,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#22
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.