↓ Skip to main content

Constituting large-scale biology: Building a regime of governance in the early years of the Human Genome Project

Overview of attention for article published in BioSocieties, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Constituting large-scale biology: Building a regime of governance in the early years of the Human Genome Project
Published in
BioSocieties, October 2013
DOI 10.1057/biosoc.2013.31
Authors

Stephen Hilgartner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 10%
France 1 5%
United States 1 5%
Unknown 16 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 30%
Researcher 6 30%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 13 65%
Philosophy 5 25%
Computer Science 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2013.
All research outputs
#3,025,719
of 4,505,482 outputs
Outputs from BioSocieties
#95
of 106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,991
of 101,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioSocieties
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,505,482 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 106 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.