| Title |
Spatial analysis of condyle position according to sagittal skeletal relationship, assessed by cone beam computed tomography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Progress in Orthodontics, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2196-1042-14-36 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jessica M Arieta-Miranda, Manuel Silva-Valencia, Carlos Flores-Mir, Ney A Paredes-Sampen, Luis E Arriola-Guillen |
| Abstract |
The study aims to compare the condylar position in patients with different anteroposterior sagittal skeletal relationships through a cone beam computed generated tomography (CBCT) imaging generated space analysis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 140 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 46 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 60% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 50 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2013.
All research outputs
#14,913,921
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Orthodontics
#72
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,736
of 224,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Orthodontics
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.