↓ Skip to main content

Perceptions of an open visitation policy by intensive care unit workers

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
Title
Perceptions of an open visitation policy by intensive care unit workers
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/2110-5820-3-34
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernando José da Silva Ramos, Renata Rego Lins Fumis, Luciano Cesar Pontes Azevedo, Guilherme Schettino

Abstract

An intensive care unit (ICU) admission is a stressful event for the patient and the patient's family. Several studies demonstrated symptoms of anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder in family members of patients admitted to ICU. Some studies recognize that the open visitation policy (OVP) is related to a reduction in symptoms of anxiety and depression for the patient and an improvement in family satisfaction. However, some issues have been presented as barriers for the adoption of that strategy. This study was designed to evaluate perceptions of physicians, nurses, and respiratory therapists (RTs) of an OVP and to quantify visiting times in a Brazilian private intensive care unit (ICU).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 145 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 17%
Student > Bachelor 25 17%
Student > Postgraduate 19 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 29 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 29%
Psychology 10 7%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 39 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2018.
All research outputs
#6,495,686
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#648
of 1,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,863
of 224,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.