↓ Skip to main content

Use of physical restraints among patients with bipolar disorder in Ethiopian Mental Specialized Hospital, outpatient department: cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Bipolar Disorders, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Use of physical restraints among patients with bipolar disorder in Ethiopian Mental Specialized Hospital, outpatient department: cross-sectional study
Published in
International Journal of Bipolar Disorders, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40345-017-0084-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Habte Belete

Abstract

Even though United Nation announced that all persons with a mental illness shall be treated with humanity and respect for the inherent dignity of the human being, up to now, the use of coercion (physical restrain) is still considered as unavoidable in managing abnormal behavior of psychiatric patients. But, there is no information regarding the magnitude and contributing factors of physical restrain among bipolar patients in low-income countries like Ethiopia. A cross-sectional study was conducted at Amanuel Mental Specialized Hospital from May 1 to June 1, 2015 among 400 participants who were selected by systematic random sampling technique. Data were collected by interviewing; adjusted odd ratios (AOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used and p value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. The prevalence of physical restrain was 65%. Factors like, having two or more episodes [AOR = 1.84 95% CI (1.16, 2.93)], history of aggression [AOR = 2.14, 95% CI (1.26, 3.63)], comorbid illness [AOR = 1.76, 95% CI (1.26, 3.63)], use of antipsychotic [AOR = 1.79, 95% CI (1.08, 2.95)] and current use of Khat [AOR = 1.83, 95% CI (1.10, 3.04)] were associated significantly. The prevalence of physical restraint is found high among bipolar patients and it needs public health attention.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 23%
Student > Master 11 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Other 3 5%
Lecturer 3 5%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 17 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 15 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 21%
Psychology 8 14%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 18 32%