↓ Skip to main content

Fiscal Devaluation in a Monetary Union

Overview of attention for article published in IMF Economic Review, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Fiscal Devaluation in a Monetary Union
Published in
IMF Economic Review, February 2017
DOI 10.1057/s41308-016-0002-4
Authors

Philipp Engler, Giovanni Ganelli, Juha Tervala, Simon Voigts

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 35%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Professor 3 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Other 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 21 81%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Chemistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,599,948
of 12,600,506 outputs
Outputs from IMF Economic Review
#73
of 111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,955
of 257,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IMF Economic Review
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,600,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 111 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them