↓ Skip to main content

Colonisation of the Krakatau islands by invertebrates

Overview of attention for article published in GeoJournal, October 1992
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 378)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Colonisation of the Krakatau islands by invertebrates
Published in
GeoJournal, October 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf00177235
Authors

T.R. New, I.W.B. Thornton

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 67%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,920,673
of 13,177,477 outputs
Outputs from GeoJournal
#41
of 378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,794
of 262,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GeoJournal
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,177,477 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 378 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them