| Title |
Prediction of the muscle strength by the muscle thickness and hardness using ultrasound muscle hardness meter
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
SpringerPlus, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2193-1801-2-457 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Satoshi Muraki, Kiyotaka Fukumoto, Osamu Fukuda |
| Abstract |
The present study investigated whether a combination of the thickness and hardness of muscles without muscle tension can be used to estimate muscle strength during knee extension in adult males and females. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 98 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 20% |
| Researcher | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 24 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 24% |
| Engineering | 15 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2013.
All research outputs
#15,279,577
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#932
of 1,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,911
of 198,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#51
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.