↓ Skip to main content

Reaching around barriers: the performance of the great apes and 3–5-year-old children

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
Reaching around barriers: the performance of the great apes and 3–5-year-old children
Published in
Animal Cognition, August 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10071-009-0265-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Petra H. J. M. Vlamings, Brian Hare, Josep Call

Abstract

Inhibitory control has been suggested as a key predictive measure of problem-solving skills in human and nonhuman animals. However, there has yet to be a direct comparison of the inhibitory skills of the nonhuman apes and their development in human children. We compared the inhibitory skills of all great ape species, including 3-5-year-old children in a detour-reaching task, which required subjects to avoid reaching directly for food and instead use an indirect reaching method to successfully obtain the food. We tested 22 chimpanzees, 18 bonobos, 18 orangutans, 6 gorillas and 42 children. Our sample included chimpanzees, bonobos and orangutans housed in zoos (N = 27) and others housed in sanctuaries in their native habitats (N = 37). Overall, orangutans were the most skilful apes, including human children. As expected older children outperformed younger children. Sanctuary chimpanzees and bonobos outperformed their zoo counterparts whereas there was no difference between the two orangutan samples. Most zoo chimpanzees and bonobos failed to solve the original task, but improved their performance with additional training, although the training method determined to a considerable extent the level of success that the apes achieved in a transfer phase. In general, the performance of the older children was far from perfect and comparable to some of the nonhuman apes tested.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Austria 3 2%
Germany 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 116 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 31%
Researcher 27 21%
Student > Master 20 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 24 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 48%
Psychology 44 34%
Unspecified 10 8%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 8 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2016.
All research outputs
#749,807
of 12,440,051 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#200
of 917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,061
of 155,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,440,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.